In the first, the connection between PCM and you can NCM is evaluated therefore try discovered that PCM ( Yards = ; DP = ) correlates adversely on NCM ( Yards = ; DP = ); p =
Note. PCM = Determination for self-confident childbirth; NCM = Desire to have negative childbirth; Mann-Whitney “U”; PSest = Likelihood of excellence index.
PCM profile displayed zero differences between individuals who was indeed dating and you may people who was basically partnered or even in a reliable commitment ( U = 29; p =
Statistically significant differences with small effect sizes were found in PCM in three categories tested: occupation ( U = 37; p = .035; PS est = .47), presence/absence of partner ( U = 10; p = .000; PS est = .29) and presence/absence of children ( U = 21; p = .002; PS est = .44). It was observed that the participants who were unemployed ( Mdn = ), who had one or more children ( Mdn = ) and who were in a relationship ( Mdn = ); had significantly higher levels of PCM than people who worked ( Mdn = ), who had no children ( Mdn = ) and who did not have a relationship ( Mdn = ).
On the other hand, NCM indicated statistically significant differences with small effect sizes related to sex ( U = 19; p = .000; PS est = .43) and the presence/absence of children ( U = 10; p = .000; PS est = .34). It was observed that both women ( Mdn = ) as for the participants who do not have children ( Mdn = ) have significantly higher levels of NCM than men ( Mdn = ) and participants with children ( Mdn = ).
Based on the results obtained in the comparison between people who are or are not in a stable relationship, we tested the possible differences in PCM according to the type of relationship using the Kruskal Wallis test. 000). Mann-Whitney tests were used to follow up on this finding. A Bonferroni correction was applied and all effects were tested at the .02 level. 039; PS est = .47). However, statistically significant differences were found in PCM levels between married and in a stable union ( U = 5; p = .000; PS est = .41), of which married people ( Mdn = ) had higher levels of PCM when compared to people who were in a stable union ( Mdn = ).
A couple of Spearman correlations was basically held. 000; r = -.494; roentgen dos = .twenty four. Regarding next studies the new matchmaking between PCM, NCM and you will 16 private and you can contextual parameters had been tested and can get noticed in the Desk dos. Weakened connections was in fact discover both positive and negative between PCM or NCM and you may twelve of one’s parameters checked out. Particularly the sociodemographic variables: “number of sisters” and you may “beginning purchase” and identification issues: “conscientiousness” and you may “visibility to tackle” exhibited no tall correlations which have PCM and you may NCM.
Due to the correlations found, a couple of multiple regressions was did to know and this details might possibly be considered as predictor details regarding PCM and NCM in the modern sample (Table step 3).
The brand new activities exhibited in the Dining table step three was in fact mathematically tall and said 24% of total difference out of PCM and 10% out of NCM. Eight of fourteen variables analyzed shown on their own given that significant predictors of PCM. The fresh details: religiosity, having or not that have college students, and you may decades displayed more powerful dating that have PCM, getting coefficients off ? = .32, http://www.kissbrides.com/thai-women/surin? = -.twenty two and you may ? = .17, correspondingly. Regarding the NCM, just four of a dozen details interviewed exhibited themselves given that predictor details. The newest parameters that have or not that have pupils (? = .17), ages (? = .14), religiosity (? = -.12) and gender (? = .10) demonstrated healthier dating with the NCM.